• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

The One Percent Almanack

Wit and Wisdom on Investing, Business, and Life

  • Home
  • Members
  • Log In
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Behaviouronomics: The Conjunction Fallacy

June 22, 2019

In 1983, Daniel Kahneman — the famous behavioural scientist — and his colleague Amos Tversky, published this example in Psychology Review. The example is about a fictitious character called Linda.

Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations. Based on this information about Linda, you have to estimate which of the following statements about Linda are more likely to be true.

Want to Read More? This content is exclusive for members of Value Investing Almanack. Login to read if you are a member. Else, click here to subscribe.

Benefits to VIA Members

 

  • Spotlight: Big ideas from Value Investing and why applying them in your investment decision making will be a great deal
  • InvestorInsights: Interviews with experienced value investors, learners, and deep thinkers
  • StockTalk: Thorough analysis of business models of companies (without any recommendations)
  • Behaviouronomics: Deep analysis of human behaviour and how it impacts investment decision making
  • BookWorm: Reviews of the best books on Value Investing and related subjects
  • Free Course – Financial Statement Analysis for Smart People (otherwise priced at Rs 5,900)
  • Archives: Instant access to our huge archive from the past three years

Become a VIA Member. Click to Subscribe

Filed Under: Behaviouronomics

Handcrafted with in India